Search and Seizure

Exploring the reach and the limits of the Fourth Amendment in the modern world

  • About the author
  • Supreme Court Cases

Addressing Police Lethal Use of Force, Part II–No Knock Search Warrants

Posted by simmons.239@osu.edu on June 15, 2021
Posted in: Legislation, Policing. Tagged: Breanna Taylor, George Floyd, George Floyd Act, no-knock search warrants.

Federal look into Breonna Taylor's death casts a wider net
See the source image

One of the more popular aspects of the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act is the provision that bans so-called “no-knock” warrants for all federal law enforcement and revokes all aid to state and local police forces unless they follow suit. Given the vast amount of money that the federal government makes available for law enforcement, this is likely to be an effective way to change protocols across the country: by some accounts, various federal agencies pay over a billion dollars a year to state and local police forces.

No-knock search warrants became particularly infamous in 2020 because of the death of Breonna Taylor in Louisville during the execution of a no-knock warrant. These warrants are relatively common: one estimate is that over 20,000 no-knock search warrants are executed each year. They are used most often in drug cases–by some estimates, over 80% of these warrants are for suspected drug locations. Police need only demonstrate a reasonable belief that the usual practice of “knock and announce” (followed by an appropriate waiting period of 15-20 seconds) would lead to the destruction of evidence or would endanger officers. But by now we have enough evidence that the potential risks of these warrants far outweigh the potential gains.

The justification for these warrants is that they prevent the suspects from destroying evidence, and that they may be safer for officers because the suspects do not have time to prepare a violent response. Given the fact that a traditional warrant execution only gives the residents of the building fifteen to twenty seconds of warning before police force entry, there is little chance that criminals could effectively destroy of all of the evidence of their crime, even if it something as disposable as drugs, in such a short period of time. And an empirical study in Kansas City found no evidence that no-knock search warrants are safer than traditional warrants. Instead, it appears that these warrants endanger the lives of the police who execute them and the lives of those in the home being searched. Although there is plenty of anecdotal evidence of innocent individuals like Taylor being killed in no-knock raids, there is not very much in the way of hard statistics about how many deaths each year occur as a result of this practice. A New York Times investigation found “only” 81 civilian deaths and 13 police deaths over the six year period between 2010 and 2016, but that investigation only looked into raids conducted by SWAT teams, and so did not cover all of the no-knock warrants during that time period. Although this is a small percentage of the total number of deaths caused by police officers, abolishing no-knock warrants is almost certainly the lowest-hanging fruit as far as reforms go–the move will increase the safety of civilians (and officers) without costing much in the way of crime control.

Posts navigation

← Addressing Police Lethal Use of Force, Part I–Mandating Body Cameras
  • Recent Posts

    • Addressing Police Lethal Use of Force, Part II–No Knock Search Warrants
    • Addressing Police Lethal Use of Force, Part I–Mandating Body Cameras
    • Police Killings Take Center Stage In Calls for Criminal Justice Reform
    • The Law Surrounding Stingrays Grows Even More Restrictive
    • The Ever-Shrinking GPS Tracking Device — And the Inevitable Privacy Debate that It Creates
  • Categories

    • Circuit Court Cases
    • Consent Searches
    • Law Review Article Reviews
    • Legislation
    • Policing
    • Searches of New Technologies
    • Searches with New Technologies
    • Special Needs
    • Supreme Court Cases
    • Third Party Doctrine
    • Uncategorized
  • Publications by Author

    Smart Surveillance: How to Interpret the Fourth Amendment in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge University Press 2019

     

    Understanding Criminal Procedure: Investigations, 8th Edition (Carolina Academic Press, 2021)

     

    Simmons and Hutchins's Learning Criminal Procedure: Investigations, 2d

    Learning Criminal Procedure: Investigations, 2nd Edition, West Publishing 2019 (with Renée Hutchins)

     

    Simmons and Hutchins's Learning Criminal Procedure: Adjudication, 2d

    Learning Criminal Procedure: Adjudications, 2nd Edition, West Publishing 2019 (with Renée Hutchins)

     

    Learning Evidence, 4th Edition, West Publishing 2018 (with Debby Merritt)

    Teaching Evidence book

    Strategies and Techniques for Teaching Evidence, Walters Kluwer 2013

    Teaching Evidence Law : Contemporary Trends and Innovations book cover

    Learning Evidence with an Uncasebook, in Teaching Evidence Law: Contemporary Trends and Innovations (Yvonne Daly, Jeremy Gans, PJ Schwikkard eds.) Routledge 2021

    Grand jury book

    The True Goals of the Modern Grand Jury--and How to Achieve Them, in Grand Jury 2.0: Modern Perspectives on the Grand Jury (Roger Fairfax, Jr. ed.) Carolina Academic Press 2011

     

     

  • Archives

    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • December 2015
    • October 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
  • Recent Comments

    • гостиничные чеки купить в Екатеринбурге on How Big Data will revolutionize the criminal justice system
    • praca w niemczech opieka on Supreme Court Preview: City of Los Angeles v. Patel
    • praca w holandii kraków on Supreme Court Preview: City of Los Angeles v. Patel
    • cryptosoft judi slot on Stingrays vs. Cryptophones: The cell phone surveillance arms race heats up
    • Solitaire Games on Stingrays vs. Cryptophones: The cell phone surveillance arms race heats up
  • Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org
  • Admin

    P

    P|H |U

    • 24 : 0
    • 7: 0
    • 30: 0
    • Now: 0
Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Parament by Automattic.